Person

James W. Flower

Regulator action

United States. Named in 2 sanctions listings.

Screen this subject

Sanctions and listings2

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    06/12/2017: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2014040644001 TO: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") RE: James Flower, Respondent General Securities Representative (CRD No. 2817701) Pursuant to FINRA Rule 9216 of FINRA's Code of Procedure, I, James Flower ("Flower" or the "Respondent") submit this Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") for the purpose of proposing a settlement of the alleged rule violations described

    Reference 2014040644001finra.orgdata-portal.finra.org

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    04/10/2020: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. JAMES W. FLOWER (CRD No. 2817701), Respondent. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING No. 2017052701101 COMPLAINT The Department of Enforcement alleges: SUMMARY 1. Between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2018 (the "Relevant Period"), Respondent

    05/27/2021: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. JAMES W. FLOWER (CRD No. 2817701), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2017052701101 Hearing Officer—LOM EXTENDED HEARING PANEL DECISION May 27, 2021 Respondent, James W. Flower, excessively traded in five customer accounts in violation of FINRA rules regarding quantitative unsuitability. Respondent’s misconduct rose to the level of churning because he traded for his own benefit, in reckless

    Reference 2017052701101data-portal.finra.orgfinra.orgdata-portal.finra.org

Identifiers1

IdentifierNumber
ID number2817701

Other names2

Also known as2

JAMES WILLIAM FLOWERJAMES FLOWER

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.