Company

The Governor and Company of The Bank of Ireland

Regulator warning

Ireland. Named in 2 sanctions listings.

Screen this subject

Sanctions and listings2

  • Effective
    27 Jul 2020

    MiFID

    Central Bank of Ireland (CBI)EU ESMA SanctionsIreland

    Administrative sanction and measure

    ENFORCEMENT ACTION Central Bank of Ireland and The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland fined €1,660,000 and reprimanded by the Central Bank of Ireland for regulatory breaches causing loss to a client and for misleading the Central Bank in the course of the investigation On 27 July 2020, the Central Bank of Ireland (the Central Bank) reprimanded and fined The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland (BOI) for five breaches of the European Communities (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulations 2007 (the MiFID Regulations) committed by its former subsidiary, Bank of Ireland Private Banking Limited (BOIPB). BOI has admitted the breaches, which vary in length from one to ten years. In line with its published Sanctions Guidance, the Central Bank has determined the appropriate fine to be €2,370,000, which has been reduced by 30% in accordance with the settlement discount scheme provided for in the Central Bank’s Administrative Sanctions Procedure. The Central Bank’s investigation arose from a cyber-fraud incident that occurred in September 2014 (the Incident). Acting on instructions from a fraudster impersonating a client, BOIPB made two payments to a third party account totalling €106,430: one from a client’s personal current account, the other from BOIPB’s own funds. BOIPB immediately reimbursed the client. During a Full Risk Assessment of BOIPB in 2015, the Central Bank discovered a reference to the Incident in an operational incident log. BOIPB had not reported the cyber-fraud to An Garda Síochána, and only did so at the request of the Central Bank over one year after the Incident. The Central Bank’s investigation found serious deficiencies in respect of third party payments, including:  Inadequate systems and controls to minimise the risk of loss from fraud  Inadequate governance, oversight and ongoing review of the systems and control environment  Lack of staff training and a culture in which fulfilling clients’ instructions was given primacy over security and regulatory requirements  Lack of compliance monitoring. BOIPB’s failure to be open and transparent had the effect of misleading the Central Bank in the course of the investigation. BOIPB failed for a period of 19 months to disclose to the Central Bank an internal report, commissioned following the Incident, which identified ongoing systemic control failings in the processing of third party payments. During that same period, BOIPB strenuously denied the existence of any such failings to the Central Bank in response to the investigation. BOIPB’s conduct materially added to the time it took to investigate this case. This is one of two aggravating factors in this case;the other being the excessive amount of time it took BOIPB to fully remediate the relevant deficiencies. Remediation in relation to third party payment processes took place in February 2016, 17 months after the Incident, and then only following the Central Bank’s intervention. In August 2016, the Central Bank determined that a Risk Mitigation Programme (RMP) relating to third party payment processes was completed. More detailed information regarding this sanction is available on the Central Bank of Ireland's website.

    registers.esma.europa.eu

  • Effective
    19 Dec 1991
    Ended
    2 Jun 1994

    US Federal Reserve Enforcement Actions

    Federal Reserve BoardUS Federal Reserve Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    Written Agreement

    Programme US-FED-ENFfederalreserve.gov

Identifiers1

IdentifierNumber
LEIQ2GQA2KF6XJ24W42G291

Addresses1

  • Dublin, Ireland

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.