Person

IFTIKHAR UL HAQ

Regulator action

United States. Named in 1 sanctions listing.

Screen this subject

Sanctions and listings1

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    11/01/2007: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. IFTIKHAR UL HAQ (CRD No. 4212059), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. ELI2004026701 Hearing Officer-AWH HEARING PANEL DECISION November 1, 2007 Registered representative barred from associating with any member firm in any capacity and ordered to make restitution to customer for unauthorized and excessive trading in customer's account, in violation of NASD Conduct Rules 2310 and 2110. Respondent

    11/30/2006: NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. IFTIKHAR UL HAQ (CRD No. 4212059), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. ELI2004026701 Hearing Officer - COMPLAINT The Department of Enforcement alleges: JURISDICTION 1. Respondent Iftikhar Ul Haq ("Respondent") first became registered with NASD, as a General Securities Representative ("GSR"), on approximately September 8, 2000. 2. Respondent was registered with GunnAllen Financial, Inc. ("GunnAllen") from on or about October 21,

    04/06/2009: BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY In the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. Iftikhar Ul Haq Toms River, NJ, Respondent DECISION Complaint No, EI22004026701 April 6, 2009 Respondent engaged in unauthorized transactions and unsuitable excessive trading in one customer's account. Held, findings and sanctions affirmed. Appearances For the Complainant: Samuel L. Barkin, Esq., and Leo F. Orenstein, Esq., Department of Enforcement, Financial

    Reference ELI2004026701data-portal.finra.orgdata-portal.finra.orgdata-portal.finra.orgfinra.org

Identifiers1

IdentifierNumber
ID number4212059

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.