Andrei Alekseyevich PAVLOV
Sanctioned entityBorn 7 Aug 1977 (49 years old),Russia. Named in 6 sanctions listings.
Summary
The Director Disqualification Sanction was imposed on 09/04/2025.
Sanctions and listings6
Serious Corruption Sanctions Regime - Autonomous (Thematic – Corruption)
Department of Foreign Affairs and TradeAustralian Sanctions Consolidated ListAustralia
Travel ban and targeted financial sanction
Autonomous Sanctions (Designated Persons and Entities and Declared Persons—Thematic Sanctions) Instrument 2022
Programme AU-CRPLast updated 30 Mar 2022dfat.gov.audfat.gov.au
- Listed
- 20 Dec 2017
Magnitsky Sanctions - MAGNIT
Office of Foreign Assets ControlUS OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) ListUnited States
MAGNIT and block
Magnitsky
Programme US-MAGNITSKYReference 23249treasury.govofac.treasury.gov
- Effective
- 26 Apr 2021
UK sanctions relating to global anti-corruption - The Global Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regulations 2021
UK; Foreign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeUK FCDO Sanctions ListUnited Kingdom
Director Disqualification Sanction, travel ban and asset freeze
In December 2007, an organised criminal group was involved in serious corruption through the misappropriation of the equivalent of $230m of Russian state property via a complex scheme involving a fraudulent tax rebate. PAVLOV participated in the fraud through his involvement, in particular, in court processes based on fraudulent claims for damages, as the lawyer representing Rilend. His actions facilitated or provided support for the serious corruption.
Programme GB-ACReference GAC0007Reference 14084Last updated 9 Apr 2025gov.ukgov.uk
- Listed
- 3 May 2018
- Effective
- 20 Dec 2017
Reciprocal
OFACUS SAM Procurement ExclusionsUnited StatesActive
Prohibition/Restriction
Redacted for Security Reasons
Official designation
Legal Acts Of The Republic Of LatviaLatvia's Magnitsky Law Sanctions ListLatvia
Positions held1
Period not retained
Lawyer
Other names16
Also known as16
This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.