Person

Dmitri Kovtun

Sanctioned entity

Born 25 Sep 1965 (61 years old),Russia. Named in 4 sanctions listings.

Screen this subject

Summary

Subject to an ACTSA asset freeze from 2016-2022 The Director Disqualification Sanction was imposed on 09/04/2025.

Sanctions and listings4

  • Effective
    13 Jan 2022

    UK sanctions relating to global human rights - The Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020

    UK; Foreign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeUK FCDO Sanctions ListUnited Kingdom

    Asset freeze, travel ban and director disqualification sanction

    Dmitry Kovtun is a former member of the Russian military. He was one of the two individuals found to be responsible by the Litvinenko Inquiry for the killing of Alexander Litvinenko through deliberate poisoning with polonium 210 in November 2006. This action constitutes a serious violation of the right to life. It is probable that this action was carried out under the direction of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB).

    Programme GB-HRReference 13311Reference GHR0083Last updated 9 Apr 2025gov.ukgov.uk

  • Listed
    9 Jan 2017

    Magnitsky Sanctions - MAGNIT

    Office of Foreign Assets ControlUS OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) ListUnited States

    MAGNIT and block

    Magnitsky

    Programme US-MAGNITSKYReference 21185treasury.govofac.treasury.gov

  • Listed
    26 Jan 2017
    Effective
    9 Jan 2017

    Reciprocal

    OFACUS SAM Procurement ExclusionsUnited StatesActive

    Prohibition/Restriction

    Redacted for Security Reasons

    sam.gov

  • Official designation

    Legal Acts Of The Republic Of LatviaLatvia's Magnitsky Law Sanctions ListLatvia

    likumi.lv

Positions held1

  1. Period not retained

    General Director of Global Project LLC

Other names4

Also known as4

Дмитрий Вадимович КовтунKOVTUN, DmitriDmitry Vadimovich KOVTUNKovtuns, Dmitrijs

Addresses1

  • Apartment no. 150, Golubinskay Street, Moscow, Russia, 117463

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.