Type not stated

DAVID WOLK

Regulator action

United States. Named in 2 sanctions listings.

Screen this subject

Sanctions and listings2

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    08/18/2014: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT NO. 2012034393403 TO: Department of Enforcement Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") RE: David Wolk, Respondent Registered Representative CRD No. 2945630 Pursuant to FINRA Rule 9216 of FINRA's Code of Procedure, I David Wolk ("Wolk" or "Respondent") submit this Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC") for the purpose of proposing a settlement of the alleged rule

    Reference 2012034393403data-portal.finra.orgfinra.org

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    08/19/2015: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, V. DAVID WOLK (CRD No. 2945630), Respondent. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING No. 2012033981601 COMPLAINT The Department of Enforcement ("Department") alleges: SUMMARY 1. From November 2003 through January 2014, while associated with Woodstock Financial Group, Inc. (''Woodstock"), Respondent David Wolk was subject, at various times, to six tax liens totaling over $810,000 and a state tax levy

    01/14/2016: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. DAVID WOLK (CRD No. 2945630), Respondent. Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2012033981601 Hearing Officer-MAD AMENDED DEFAULT DECISION January 14, 2016 For willfully failing to timely amend his Form U4, in violation of Article V, Section 2(c) of the NASD and FINRA By-Laws, FlNRA Rules 1122 and 2010, NASD Rule 2110, and NASD IM-1000-1, Respondent is suspended from associating with any

    Reference 2012033981601data-portal.finra.orgdata-portal.finra.orgfinra.org

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.