Type not stated

ARTHUR W. COMPANY INC.

Regulator action

United States. Named in 1 sanctions listing.

Screen this subject

Sanctions and listings1

  • Official designation

    Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityUS FINRA Enforcement ActionsUnited States

    04/25/2014: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS Department of Enforcement, Complainant, v. Wood (Arthur W.) Company, Inc. (BD 3798) Respondent DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING No. 2011025444501 COMPLAINT The Department of Enforcement (''Enforcement") alleges: SUMMARY 1. Between June 2008 and September 2011, Respondent Wood (Arthur W.) Company, Inc. ("WCI" or the "Firm") failed to implement its anti-money laundering ("AML") procedures. The Firm failed to detect and investigate red flags indicative

    10/29/2015: FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, v. WOOD (ARTHUR W.) COMPANY, INC. (CRD No. 3798) Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2011025444501 Hearing Officer-DRS HEARING PANEL DECISION October 29, 2015 Member firm (1) failed to implement and enforce its anti-money laundering program, (2) failed to conduct adequate independent anti-money laundering tests, (3) charged unreasonable and unfair commissions on equity transactions, (4) failed to establish,

    03/15/2017: BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY In the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs. Wood (Arthur W.) Company, Inc., Respondent. DECISION Complaint No. 2011025444501 Dated: March 15, 2017 Member firm failed to implement and enforce its AML procedures; failed to conduct adequate independent AML tests; charged excessive commissions; failed to supervise commissions; conducted a securities business while net capital deficient; failed to file a notice of

    Reference 2011025444501data-portal.finra.orgdata-portal.finra.orgfinra.orgdata-portal.finra.org

Other names1

Also known as1

WOOD COMPANY INC.

This page shows the public record as its publishers state it. A name here is not by itself a finding: whether a record refers to a particular person or company is what screening decides. Read the full notice.